‘Birther’ bill passed by Arizona Senate

find your strange bedfellows here

Re: ‘Birther’ bill passed by Arizona Senate

Postby ST » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:20 pm

The veto was the right decision. It's a wingnut bill that only serves to make Arizona Republicans look bad. Rachel Maddow has had a lot of fun with this on her show the last week.

That said, I still don't see where it would conflict with federal law, if it had been signed.
Scott Tibbs
www.ConservaTibbs.com


Cursed be he that smiteth his neighbour secretly. And all the people shall say, Amen. - Deuteronomy 27:24
User avatar
ST
I never stabbed anyone with a rusty nail.
 
Posts: 7697
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:46 am
Location: Indiana
Has thanked: 5 times
Have thanks: 39 times

Re: ‘Birther’ bill passed by Arizona Senate

Postby Louie » Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:46 pm

I would think that this bill would violate the first two sections of Article 4 of the Constitution. Arizona would lack the constituional authority to override Hawaii's official recognition of Obama being born in Hawaii. Arizona is required to accept the full faith and credit of Hawaii's representation in this matter.

Or not.
Dogmatic Liberalism--The New Shallow Thinkers, but Not as Clueless as the Ultra Shallow Thinking of the Corporate Fart Suckers LIke Raving Karl
Louie
Entrenched
 
Posts: 12837
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 11:51 am
Has thanked: 0 times
Have thanks: 77 times

Previous

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 1 guest

cron